The relationship between Charles III and Prince Harry is at a point where both parties are used to living with their relationship frozen. The tensions and conflicts that started long before the Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced their departure from the British royal family remain unresolved and life continues based on emotional adaptations and routines. However, when the British monarch is diagnosed with cancer, his son flies to see him (literally and figuratively). After the transoceanic journey, Charles III dedicated 45 minutes to his son and headed for his retirement at Sandringham. Harry was pleased with the brief encounter, but when he returned three months later, in a spontaneous turn of events, the sovereign took over his schedule to celebrate his first party after cancer while Harry was celebrating at St. Paul’s Cathedral. ten years Invitus Games In short alone, there is scope for reconciliation and the question remains: Why compromise was not possible? Now, with the change in circumstances, things may take a different turn.
© Kensington Palace‘Royalties operate in a way that the public often doesn’t understand’
Tina Brown, the journalist who belongs to the Diana of Wales circle and whose career and information has positioned her as a reliable voice in the Windsor case, has revealed in her new blog that a royal source has confirmed that “Sir Clive Alderton, the all-powerful private secretary, gatekeeper to the king and Harry’s sworn enemy, is considering retirement”. “The royal council is managed in a way that the public does not usually understand, their private secretaries are able to block people’s access to their private lists and address them,” the journalist explained.
© Getty Images
© Getty Images“If Alderton leaves, it could pave the way for a new, amicable negotiation with Harry to give him the security he wants and for him. Resume an abbreviated version of his royal duties. It could also present a huge lifeline for Meghan, who by now must realize that the annoying demands of second-rate royalty are less difficult than serial failures. rebranding”Brown said in an article in which he showed that he did not support the decisions made by the Duchess of Sussex. This is not the first time that Brown has cited Harry’s recent strategy in terms of his public profile as a mistake when assessing Harry’s role in the British Royal House.
Who is Harry’s enemy?
It must be made clear that Prince Harry (perhaps by his own decision or on the advice of his publisher) did not name Sir Clive Alderton in his memoirs. extra And which was sold in January 2023. Alderton is a long-time diplomat who joined the FCO (Office of Foreign Affairs) in 1986 and who entered the British Royal Family in 2006 until he became the Sovereign’s Private Secretary and, therefore, the highest-ranking operational member of the British monarchy. However, Prince Harry’s description of an employee of the British royal family led many, such as Tina Brown, to conclude that “The Hornet” Harry was referring to was none other than Alderton.
© Getty Images
© Getty Images“The Hornet was shy, charming, haughty, he overflowed with energy. He was a teacher, respected, even enslaved. You state a fact, which at first prevented any discussion – ‘The sun rises in the morning’ – and he babbles. Do that it should be considered for a moment that you were not well informed: ‘Well, hey, I don’t know what to tell you, you see, it all depends on what you understand in the morning, Sir.’ Her vulnerable appearance and apparent modesty can tempt you to separate and defend your position, and before long she’ll have you on her list, a sting you’ll scream,” explains Harry in a book about how family relationships are handled within the British Royal House. He shared his view about it.
Another idea is provided by its story Harry and this fits perfectly with what Tina Brown just revealed is the power of employees Those holding high positions in the British Royal House. “They are all middle-aged white men who managed to consolidate their power through a series of daring Machiavellian strategies…” explained the Duke of Sussex.
‘They were taking advantage of the Queen in her old age, taking advantage of her position…’
“I had a great dislike for them and they couldn’t stand me. They thought me at best irrelevant, at worst an idiot. But, after all, they knew I saw them as usurpers. Deep down, I doubted they considered themselves. A true king And they were taking advantage of the Queen in her old age, taking advantage of her position of influence to be there only to serve her,” Harry said before giving the example that Elizabeth II tasked these officials with helping them attack certain tabloids, with which Harry has always been quite successfully courted. According to Harry’s version, both Elizabeth II and Charles III’s secretaries acknowledged that it was something “disproportionate” and “unprecedented”, but nothing about it. did not
© GTRESIs it reasonable to forgive for practical reasons?
Nor does it seem fair to place all responsibility for the past and future expectations on third parties, no matter how powerful they may be. In his book, Prince Harry shares many personal details about his father, a story full of everyday life that straddles compassion and anger. Far from the aloof and cold image we imagined, Charles III was portrayed as a disarming man who wanted to be a good father, but couldn’t or didn’t know how. For Harry, his father is a noble and kind man, a victim of his childhood, his position and his inner circle. However, Queen Camilla was described as the true villain of all history, a title that scarred her for life. As it happened, Neither Queen Camilla nor Charles III found it easy to forget that chapter of the book And something similar happens with everything involving the princes of Wales.
© Getty Images‘William, whatever his abiding resentment towards Harry, he should accept it now.’
For Tina Brown, known for her books about British royalty and also for her collaborations on television, there is light at the end of the tunnel, albeit for more practical than emotional reasons. “Enough of the war. Families need to stick together with this one. William, whatever his lingering resentment towards Harry for his unbridled attack on the ‘spare’, should now accept it and let his father do something to Harry.” In Trump’s isolationist world, the UK needs to move closer to Europe and romanticize its relationship with the Commonwealth. The Princes of Wales fear foreign tours that keep the Princess away from the children And they cut into what Prince William (to the chagrin of his advisers) calls his ‘me time’. So let the small but important tours fall to the Sussexes, who will spend five years in the wilderness exporting some modern royal flair, especially to the hotspots of the former colonies. “Wasn’t that the original plan?” Diana of Wales sums up the situation when the two sons confront each other.
© Getty ImagesAccording to this theory, The Crown needs Harry as much as the Crown needs Harry. Not only Brown, but also Robert Hardman’s biographers, said Prince Harry was a great asset to the British royal family, like the Princess Anne of his generation, always willing to work and never expecting. A privileged contract for this. On the other hand, his marriage to Meghan, and the extraordinary fame they enjoyed for some time before the free fall, forced him to reconsider his priorities, and he has already actively and passively stated that the safety of his family is his only priority. . Under this prism, Harry could learn to stay away from the crown and not miss out. In recent months, he has successfully adopted a singular agenda and positioned himself firmly in areas that often receive little media attention.
